Faith Off
Tuesday, June 5, 2007
Andrew Sullivan on Monday's "Faith Off" on CNN:
I went to the Democratic faith-off last night to see Edwards, Obama and Clinton expose their religious life to a religious-left audience. It felt to me like that scene in Coriolanus when the great leader is forced to go into the town square and let the hoi polloi examine, discuss and judge his war-scars. It was a spectacle at once spiritually crass, politicallly vulgar and democratically corrosive. It didn't help that the theologically-challenged moderator, CNN's Soledad O'Brien, asked questions like: "What's the biggest sin you've ever committed?" Just when you think cable news cannot get any dumber, someone like Ms O'Brien slinks onto a stage.
But the implications of the debate were more worrying. We have had terrible problems grappling with the religious right these past few years, but we may have just begun to adjust to the power and emergence of the religious left. The rhetoric would have done evangelical statist, Michael Gerson, proud. And when you see three leading Democratic candidates fall over each other to endorse faith-based initiatives, and insist, in Clinton's words, on "injecting faith into policy," or, in Obama's words, basing politics on a "Biblical injunction," you realize that George W. Bush really has had a legacy. He has decisively increased the religiosity of public debate - as well, of course, as its fatuousness. How can we "end poverty" in the next ten years, asked Jim Wallis? Umm: didn't LBJ already try that? And, given the certainty and self-righteousness all around me, why not just end poverty, illness, and illegitimacy in the next ten months? Why not end tyranny as well, while we're at it? (Oops: we just tried that. Never mind.) Jeez. Some people just keep putting boundaries on the power of God. When merged with government, what social ill can it not solve?
I watched part of the show, and while I disagree that it's corrosive (why is it more corrosive that being forced to raise your hand repeatedly and declare positions on complex issues, like English as the official languaged?), I can't disagree that it was not all that enlightening. I did find Hillary Clinton more relaxed than I have seen her in many months. Maybe she's gaining confidence with her continued success and at having been so stellar on Sunday night.
As for which questions I wish were asked, click here.
Labels: God in Politics
Posted by B Feiler at 3:47 PM
Permalink
Digg this Post
Email this Post
0 Comments:
Previous Posts
- The Logo That Ate the Olympics
- The Goats That Saved the South
- How 'Bout Those Eyes
- Talk Clock for President
- No Questions About God
- The God Wars
- Paula Deen V. the Pork Packers
- Top Four Languages at Yale
- WALKING THE BIBLE Podcast
- Poetry Reference of the Month
Search Feiler Faster
|
|
|
|




