Harry Potter Is Christopher Hitchens' Best Friend
Thursday, July 12, 2007
First Harry Potter is bad for reading. Now he's bad for God. What's next: England?
Rowling's work is so familiar that we've forgotten how radical it really is. Look at her literary forebears. In The Lord of the Rings, J.R.R. Tolkien fused his ardent Catholicism with a deep, nostalgic love for the unspoiled English landscape. C.S. Lewis was a devout Anglican whose Chronicles of Narnia forms an extended argument for Christian faith. Now look at Rowling's books. What's missing? If you want to know who dies in Harry Potter, the answer is easy: God.
Harry Potter lives in a world free of any religion or spirituality of any kind. He lives surrounded by ghosts but has no one to pray to, even if he were so inclined, which he isn't. Rowling has more in common with celebrity atheists like Christopher Hitchens than she has with Tolkien and Lewis.
What does Harry have instead of God? Rowling's answer, at once glib and profound, is that Harry's power comes from love. This charming notion represents a cultural sea change. In the new millennium, magic comes not from God or nature or anything grander or more mystical than a mere human emotion. In choosing Rowling as the reigning dreamer of our era, we have chosen a writer who dreams of a secular, bureaucratized, all-too-human sorcery, in which psychology and technology have superseded the sacred.
Labels: The Bible in Pop Culture
Posted by B Feiler at 9:13 PM
Permalink
Digg this Post
Email this Post
0 Comments:
Previous Posts
- Hindu v Christian in the U.S. Senate
- But It May Not Be Working
- Leveling the Praying Field
- Lame Name Tag
- The New New Old Coke
- Midnight in the Mall of Good and Evil
- Cityfolk Diggin' God
- The Inerrancy of the Koran
- Stay Away Or We'll Elope
- Why Harry Ain't Enough
Search Feiler Faster
 |
 |
 |
